Talk:Cryogenic treatment

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Eric Lotze in topic "Deep Cryogenic Treatment / Cryogenic Processing
edit

At least not yet ... Paul 01:20, 18 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's funny, I've been involved in long, drawn out discussions about what is a acceptable reference for Wikipedia, the result of these discussions is always that most sources are not objective or credible enough to satisfy the deletionists. Thsi article has as its sole source, an advertising site for a company that performs this service. No peer-reviewed metallurgy journals, nothing from ASME - nothing credible at all.

It's funny, when deletionists want to delete an article, no reference is good enough. When the deletionists don't care, any old reference will do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.156.2.34 (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bunk

edit

I think it's all bunk. This article is not helping me get over that feeling.Longinus876 (talk) 11:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

"Deep Cryogenic Treatment / Cryogenic Processing

edit