Talk:Cryogenine

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Cryogenine.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Based on PubChem and a couple of articles I have seen (http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2010/CC/c0cc01885f) - I think that the structure is incorrect and should be changed to the one in the following ChemSpider record - http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.4474587.html. Rather than make the change and then have the debate - does anyone disagree with me making this change? The chemistds (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Both images appeared to be incorrect, so I have removed them and added a corrected version. Please check to see if it looks right to you now. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic