Talk:Cryptanalysis of the Lorenz cipher
Latest comment: 4 years ago by EpsilonCarinae in topic Align introductory image and timeline to the right
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cryptanalysis of the Lorenz cipher article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Future sections
editAfter 'Testery', I am planning:
- British Tunny
- Newmanry
- Robinsons
- Colossus
- Value of intelligence gained
How does the undulator tape correspond to the 5-hole tape rows?
editIs it just serializing each row of 5 bits or something? Which edge does it start on (the equivalent of Endianness)? Can a raw interpretation of the sample shown in the image, or an equivalent 5-hole tape, be provided? ★NealMcB★ (talk) 17:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- More research leads to more confusion and questions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baudot_code#Async_communication_endianness.2C_LSB_on_Left_vs_Right and some edits elsewhere: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Punched_tape&diff=731672647&oldid=731671909 Help! We need good sources and more clarity.... ★NealMcB★ (talk) 21:51, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- typical wiki - missing critique section, how stupid germans were not to change cypher methods - how useless broken codes were , hwo stupid to let germany attack poland, or dunkirk used NOT crypto.Juror1 (talk) 18:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Align introductory image and timeline to the right
editCurrently, the photograph of the Lorenz SZ42 severely disrupts the flow of the article, but I can't figure out how to put it and the timeline both on the far right without one of them getting pushed left. Can someone fix that? (I'm also not sure if there should be a timeline in the introduction to begin with, but that's not my main problem.) EpsilonCarinae (talk) 16:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)