Talk:CryptoRights Foundation
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
editI'll dig out media coverage on the organization. They've been active for years in the privacy & cyber liberties sphere; standards like PGP etc. --Lquilter (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- 700+ Ghits which I don't have time to wade through completely —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lquilter (talk • contribs) 01:06, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- More cites from Lexis/Nexis:
- WASHINGTON INTERNET DAILY, AUGUST 12, 2003, Vol.4, No.155, 854 words, International
... on Technology (U.S.), CryptoRights Foundation (U.S.), Cyber-Rights & ...
- 2. Telegraph Herald (Dubuque, IA), April 6, 2003 Sunday, 913 words, Code war: Battle over encryption rights intensifies; Added penalties: Draft legislation would extend prison sentences for scrambling data during the commission of a crime, ANICK JESDANUN, NEW YORK
... chief communications officer of the CryptoRights Foundation, which teaches human-rights ...
- 3. San Gabriel Valley Tribune (San Gabriel Valley, CA), March 30, 2003 Sunday, MORE NEWS, 858 words, Gunman kills rival during church service
... asks Stanton McCandlish of the CryptoRights Foundation, which teaches human rights ...
- 4. National Journal's Technology Daily, AM Edition, August 14, 2001, 85 words, CRIME: A Social Hacker's Duty
... Del Torto, founder of the CryptoRights Foundation, in remarks to a ... CRYPTORIGHTS FOUNDATION (57%); CRYPTORIGHTS FOUNDATION (57%);
- 5. Boardwatch Magazine, December 1, 2000, No. 12, Vol. 14; Pg. 122 ; ISSN: 1054-2760, 3852 words, They Might Be Giants; People, Stark, Thom
... major backing for the Cryptorights Foundation, an international lobbying ... --Lquilter (talk) 00:58, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Activity
editIs the organisation still active at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.217.133.171 (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Good question. I'll look into it. --Lquilter (talk) 01:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- FWIW, CryptoRights (https://cryptorights.foundation) is indeed still active. We're building a thinktank in northern California (CIPHR), developing a handful of small tech projects (each with big human rights implications) and currently gathering funds to launch a major new project, code-named "L7D", in 2024 with developers from around the world. We just prefer to operate quietly is all, since CRF has never been about getting credit but about injecting useful tech into the global bytestream, so please pay no attention to the small group of people behind the curtain. ;) 46.34.194.26 (talk) 07:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on CryptoRights Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080226132443/http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewForeignBureaus.asp?Page=%2FForeignBureaus%2Farchive%2F200007%2FFor20000728c.html to http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewForeignBureaus.asp?Page=%2FForeignBureaus%2Farchive%2F200007%2FFor20000728c.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)