Talk:Cryptophasia

A little annoying, but I can't figure out how to cite article 3. Every time I add a ref tag, it inserts a citation of article 1.

Hey, found a study from back in 1891 when two guys found a nine and ten year old brothers and classified it as Idioglossia. There is some interesting stuff about twin language and speech impediment... and im wondering if we should throw some stuff in our article about it, or simply edit the current idioglossia page? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1975324/?page=1 -Michele — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mel012391 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Contentless section

Social effects

In an article by Slate this was written about what is observed about the social effects of cryptophasia between twins and how it relates to societies, "Societies need 'unambiguous ways to distinguish between subject and object,'" Bakker says. 'In the twin situation these can be dispensed with, but not in languages in which it is necessary to refer to events outside the direct situation.'"

This makes little contribution due to unexplained jargon and can safely be deleted.

178.38.119.187 (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Confusing

This article uses too many words that are not used in general conversation. Is there a way for someone to make this article easier to understand? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WishfulKittyKat (talk • contribs) 23:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Artificial Intelligence

Recently artificial intelligences at Google and Facebook have been creating their own interpersonal languages in a way that appears to be cryptophasia. --Coyoty 06:42, 1 August 2017 (UTC)