Talk:Crystal Valley Cemetery
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright problem removed
editPrior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://pdfhost.focus.nps.gov/docs/NRHP/Text/82001015.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Ammodramus (talk) 00:15, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- I removed the section "Historical significance", which consisted of a six-sentence paragraph taken verbatim from the NRHP nomination form. The form was prepared by the Colorado Preservation Office; so not by a federal employee doing federal work, and therefore probably not in public domain. The paragraph was duly quote-marked and a citation provided, but six sentences seems to exceed the bounds of "brief verbatim textual excerpts" specified at WP:NFCCP; a paraphrase would have served the article's purposes just as well. Ammodramus (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- (Following restoration of deleted passage inside "Quotation" template) The problem isn't that the quotation isn't identified as such or that it isn't attributed properly. The Wikipedia policy on the use of copyrighted material states that articles may use "brief verbatim textual excerpts", and a six-sentence paragraph goes beyond a reasonable definition of "brief". Furthermore, a direct quote isn't necessary for this use in the article (as it might be in, for instance, a section dealing with a controversial passage from someone's writings). There's no reason why we shouldn't paraphrase the business about silver maples and lilacs and green sandstone. WP:NFCCP seems to call for a paraphrase instead of a quote when a paraphrase would serve equally well; and I think that's the case here. Ammodramus (talk) 01:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Wowee! Truly, you're making me feel so much better about the editing I've been doing of verbous, promotional and uncited text.
- Take a look now and see what you think.--CaroleHenson (talk) 02:14, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- I did a bit of tweaking and was able to get rid of the pull-up quote. I thought it would work better to put all the landscaping stuff together-- topography, curvilinear layout, natural vegetation and landscaping-with-gardens; then to progress to the green sandstone building material; then get down to architecture and distinctive tombs. I thought that the "principal cemetery in Manitou Springs" bit from the original pull-up quote was worth keeping, though as a paraphrase and in the "Overview" section. How does this version strike you?
- Cool subject, by the way. I don't suppose we could get a photo of the Richards mausoleum? I've photographed NRHP sites all over the country, but I don't think I've hit an Egyptian Revival site yet... Ammodramus (talk) 03:14, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, looks good! I looked at the time, but couldn't find a photo of the mausoleum that wasn't clearly without copyright issues. I could do something wild and crazy, like go take the photo myself!--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Cool subject, by the way. I don't suppose we could get a photo of the Richards mausoleum? I've photographed NRHP sites all over the country, but I don't think I've hit an Egyptian Revival site yet... Ammodramus (talk) 03:14, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crystal Valley Cemetery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130601074008/http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com:80/CO/El+Paso/state.html to http://www.nationalregisterofhistoricplaces.com/CO/El+Paso/state.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
Update?
editThe article was last edited on 19 Sept., just 10 days ago ... but the edit missed the vandal damage on 26 May to 50 monuments and grave sites: https://gazette.com/news/manitou-springs-residents-offer-reward-money-to-find-cemetery-vandals/article_e4c2ddf8-c876-11eb-ad82-3bd2162024f8.html. The arrest of Landon Wayne Johnston on 2 July for the vandalism was reported on 29 July: https://gazette.com/news/arrest-made-in-manitou-springs-cemetery-vandalism/article_b8899be2-f0b1-11eb-98c4-fb8915b88cdf.html. I can't find any further info about his trial or penalty. Ammodramus or CaroleHenson may want to update the article.
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 01:10, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Photo of Manitou Springs Historic District
editThe article doesn't mention the MSHD, and the MSHD page doesn't mention the CVC ... so what's the point of the photo? Incidentally, there is a photo of the Richards mausoleum in Wikimedia Commons; I've replaced the MSHD photo with one of the Richards mausoleum.
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 01:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)