 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 October 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedy deleted as a foreign language article that exists on another Wikimedia project, because I have not copied and pasted from any other site. I have not done anything wrong. I just wanted to post what a cubiculum was to people who didn't know what it was.
eekman15
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedy deleted because all I wanted to do was post about what a Cubiculum was to make readers read a shorter version because I think some websites on Wikipedia don't explain what it was but I put it in short words so they don't spend ages read nonsense.
eekman15
Eekman15 (talk) 09:01, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Eekman15: The speedy deletion tag did not seem valid, so I have removed it(as you cannot do so as the page creator); however, the article will need to be more than what it is currently; having independent reliable sources to support its content and indicate how this is notable. For further comment, please edit this page directly instead of clicking "Contest" every time. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
- Clearly this and the preceding section are parts of a single discussion, and hopefully converting the second in to sub-section of the first will contribute more to clarity than to confusion, producing a small reduction in net confusion.
--Jerzy•t 12:08, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Clearly this and the preceding section are parts of a single discussion, and hopefully converting the second in to sub-section of the first will contribute more to clarity than to confusion, producing a small reduction in net confusion.
- I expect the number of Orff-phans has declined, but i may not be the last of that proud species on WP, and i record here my pleasure at a sharper understanding of what that musical Bavarian gnome's poetic muse had in mind in saying "Tempus amores cubiculum non est" in, IIRC, the former's second scenic cantata, the Catulli Carmina... beyond just "something along the lines of 'If I could keep love in a bottle...'." [neglected sig:]--Jerzy•t 12:58, 15 January 2018 (UTC) (2 saves w/ in a handful of minutes)