 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled]
editI added a link from Wikipedia to the Culter Fell page on my own website because I genuinely believe that what I was offering would give anyone wanting to know about Culter Fell the chance to see pictures of it and have maps etc of a route for walking there. It does seem odd that you should turn your back on a source of good detailed information. I don't need to promote my site - it is not a commercial one. I have extensive local knowledge of this part of Scotland which I am happy to pass on because I care about the place, and in offering you links I was seeking to fill out your existing content with what could only be useful information. I find it hard to believe that you can't see the usefulness - but so be it.
Eilidh03 (talk) 19:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
The reasons why your link was reverted were explained to you on your talk page; see WP:EL#ADV. If you have something useful to contribute to an article, incorporate it into the article, or suggest the link to your own site on this page and let others judge whether or not to add it. At first sight, the only material you have that is specific to Culter Fell is a series of photographs, although when I click on the map I see some useful text and routes shown. Imo it would be better if these were on the linked page. I will therefore redirect your link there. Viewfinder (talk) 07:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)