This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This is the more common terminology, so I'm suggesting this as the target page. I don't see enough here to be a stand-alone article and once you remove the excess information about Native Americans from the other article, it also becomes pretty small. TheDracologist (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply
Oppose merge at this stage. The two articles appear to cover similarly named, but subtly different, concepts. This article covers culture change as an aspect of public policy, a deliberate & intentional process (cf. Social engineering (political science)); the other article covers changes in culture as an organic process, and is consequently not a subset of the topic here. NOTE: I agree that the other article requires significant clean up; and that its topic may not be notable. - Ryk72'c.s.n.s.'08:07, 10 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
An insightful look into the workings of cultural evolution may be gained from this paper on cultural change. There are, however, a few areas in which it may be improved. First of all, the article might benefit from having additional instances to support its points, particularly in the section on social conflict. Readers will comprehend the idea of cultural change in the context of social conflicts better with the aid of specific and understandable examples. Secondly, the article may be enhanced by providing a more organized method of presenting the information. Subheadings and a simpler layout may be used to improve the content's readability. Moreover, improving the explanation of the basic concepts discussed in the piece, including "cultural capital" and "shifting social zeitgeist," would foster a more profound comprehension of the topic. Last but not least, by removing unnecessary phrases and repetitions, the piece might be made shorter and sharper while maintaining its interesting and direct content. Danaalmeer (talk) 11:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
