Talk:CuneiForm (software)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Hmm, can someone check this
editHmm, can someone check this
No mention of the open sourcing on the US version of the supposed firms website (www.ocr.com), and there are a lot of 'cracking' groups in Russia..
62.56.120.128 (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
You can take a look at this news. Unfortunately it is in Russian. Here ate translations from online translation services: Promt and Babel Fish. Look at the very bottom.
Temarez (talk) 12:01, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
There is also news in Cognitive Technologies official website (in Russian also).
There was official press-conference regarding this event on 12 of December.
Temarez (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK, Can you get a press release from them? 62.56.77.93 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- See official press release (translation via Promt or Babel Fish). You can download this great software here. --Yaleks (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK, Can you get a press release from them? 62.56.77.93 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Have anybody tried this product? I've tried today and was surprised: this program haven't recognized anything. The quality of recognition is below any possible limit. --87.252.227.52 (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- You should try to set 200 DPI resolution to get normal results. Quality of recognition in that case can be compared to accuracy of FineReader 4 IMHO Temarez (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Online recognition
editThe link to the website simply leads to an "under construction" message. Is this service really up and running? If so, please what is the URL? SharkD (talk) 03:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Used by
edit- WatchOCR LiveCD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.85.242 (talk) 23:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
OmniFont claim removed
editI removed this claim, which was marked for clarification:
- CuneiForm uses the OmniFont system.
I think this is referring to a general omnifont approach; it's later explained that Cuneiform combines this with the general multifont approach. More detail would be helpful, but this statement seemed unnecessary and a bit confusing at the moment. -- Beland (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)