This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Curelom and cumom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I am going to suspect that this is an extinct animal. That has not been discovered yet. Just as the dinosaur they were named by those that discovered them. That does not mean that they came with a name tag and that is what they were called in their day buy those that would have called them. So as other animals found in the americas. Like the elephant, found on the prairie. There could have been others that were re named. Or dead and gone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.9.181.38 (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Untitled
editc-14 is fualty they have dated live trees at 10,000 years old which were not. so do these paleontologists really know what they are talking about. it is more of a sciencists political theory tool.
http://www.creationdigest.com/archives/C14Dating.htm http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/natsci/vertpaleo/pony3_2/pe32.htm —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.42.254.253 (talk) 18:11, 25 November 2004