Talk:Currencies of Puerto Rico/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Caribbean H.Q. in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
To start, the lead needs to be broken up into multiple paragraphs. The entire article has many long paragraphs that can simply be split up. I didn't have time to review it all now, but what I read looks very good and well-referenced. Reywas92Talk 21:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the late reply, I'm on it. - Caribbean~H.Q. 01:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I believe the first issues have been attended. - Caribbean~H.Q. 02:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    I have performed a small copyedit. Nothing except they odd typo, but there were a number capitalization errors.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Thorough, exiting and well written article. No problems meeting the good article criteria. Congratulations!
Thanks for your review, sorry for the delayed response. - Caribbean~H.Q. 22:46, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply