Talk:Cuyama, California

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

incorrect information?

edit

There are two different explanations for the name Cuyama. One of them is the same as that given on the Wikipedia page for New Cuyama.

The statement that there is no month with an average monthly temperature above 71 degrees (or whatever) seems to directly contradict the climatological data provided on the page for New Cuyama, the neighboring town, where July and August both have average monthly temperatures above 90 degrees. (Purely anecdotally, I've been there in the summer, and it is definitely well above 80 degrees.) Maybe they mean if you average the high and the low? But that seems very misleading.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cuyama, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply