Talk:CwRsync

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Bradlegar in topic "Usage note" section

merge

edit

I suggest merging cwrsync into cwRsync. Both articles discuss the same topic, and the "cwRsync" capitalization is used on the official website. --DavidCary (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Merged. --ozzmosis (talk) 20:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Another merge

edit

Can we merge CwRsync with CopSSH? They are two little (yet useful) niche programs from the same vendor, with overlapping sources (mainly the vendor's website). -- Evilninja (talk) 02:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I can see the point, although it would be an awkward mix, and the page title would be ugly. Perhaps we could restructure to a company page (Itefix) with a products section, where these two (and potentially others) could be described. Klbrain (talk) 02:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
SSH and Rsync are very different programs (even though Rsync uses ssh). They have absolutely different purposes and interface. I think their vendor is not important, because we write about the program, not its authors. Yaroslav Nikitenko (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Closing, given no support for merge and no consensus for any alternative action. Klbrain (talk) 14:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Usage note" section

edit

I added this section, but it likely doesn't meet certain Wikipedia standards. However, I added it because the documentation for cwRsync itself doesn't mention it. Because it's closed source, I'm unable to update the documentation. Bradlegar the Hobbit (talk) 17:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply