This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cyc article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Reads like an advert
editI marked this article with the Advert template because I think it violates the NPOV and encyclopedic style. Some illustrative quotes:
"The need for a massive symbolic artificial intelligence project of this kind was born in the early 1980s."
"There have been over a hundred successful applications of Cyc"
"It is based on the experience that we often have thought we understood something, but only really understood it after we had to explain or teach it to someone else."
Despite the name, the whole "Criticisms" section is somewhat positive towards Cyc.
This seems to be mostly due to a single user who added large amounts of promotional-sounding edits both to this page and the page for Douglas Lenat in 2017. Brambleboy (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
- I decided to remove the template because I couldn't find any remaining issues. Let me know if you feel otherwise. - Taxman457 (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)