Talk:Cyclic di-GMP

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microbiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More sources needed

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Some of the more specific and tentative facts should have some citation, especially if they've only been shown once. The riboswitch section is one (I think there was a paper in Science), as well as the concept of localization of DGC and PDE enzymes (4th paragraph).Tevye guy (talk) 08:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I added a citation for the localization of enzymes statement. The riboswitch citations occur in the cyclic di-GMP-I riboswitch and cyclic di-GMP-II riboswitch articles, so I didn't redundantly put them in. I can add others; other than the riboswitches, most statements are from the Tamayo paper. Zashaw (talk) 02:28, 22 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

PilZ Domains

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Also, regarding this passage (5th paragraph):

"The PilZ domain has been shown to bind cyclic di-GMP and is believed to be involved in cyclic di-GMP-dependent regulation, but the mechanism by which it does this is unknown."

How uncertain is this anymore? I thought it was pretty well established that PilZ domain proteins bind to cyclic di-GMP and cause conformational changes that turn effector proteins on/off.Tevye guy (talk) 08:48, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Plenty of New Info to Add

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The last few years have seen quite a bit of solidifying of information about more aspects of cyclic di-GMP signaling. It would be great to see this reflected on Wikipedia. Recently papers have come out demonstrating asymmetrical segregation of cyclic di-GMP into daughter cells in caulobacter (allowing the 'stalk' to form), and PilZ domains have become more established in the literature. If anyone else is interested in this, this is an article that could use some love! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.40.25.250 (talk) 09:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic