Talk:Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's team pursuit

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cycling

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Time formatting

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is it common usage anywhere to format a time of "3 minutes, 57 and 101 thousandths seconds" as 3:57:101? In spite of the obvious extra digit, that looks like 3 hours, 57 minutes to me. There's probably minimal risk of confusion, given that we're talking about 4 kilometers and not 140, but I still think it's best not to have it even look like hours. Don't fall asleep ^zzzzzz 13:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I was probably just being over-zealous with the re-formatting. People tend not to think of milliseconds as a unit of time, but as a proportion of a second, so it makes sense to differentiate. I used this format somewhere else, so I'll correct it. Yohan euan o4 (talk) 00:30, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cycling at the 2008 Summer Olympics – Men's team pursuit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:37, 3 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic