Talk:Cyclone Fantala/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 09:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
GA criteria
editWith the issues below addressed, the article fully complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as general structural layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
With the issues below addressed, the article makes full use of its substantial bibliography of reputable sources, with no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- (c) it contains no original research
The article seems to cover all encyclopedically relevant aspects of its topic for which verifiable information is available. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:40, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
The article maintains a neutral approach to its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:39, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
The article does not appear to have been subjected to disruptive editing behaviours since its creation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
All three images used in this article are public domain, and thus their usage does not risk fair use violation. All three images are suitably captioned and relevant to the article. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:06, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Comments
edit- In the introduction's second paragraph, it says, "... making its closet approach to Madagascar." Is this supposed to be "closest approach", or is "closet approach" a term in meteorology?
- Oughtn't the last sentence in the third paragraph of "Meteorological history" to have a citation?
- In the second paragraph of "Impact and records", it says, "Only four buildings withstood the estimated 350 km/h (220 mph) gusts, and even then, with moderate damage,[44] which were constructed to be cyclone-proof after Bondo in 2006." For better sentence flow, I would recommend rearranging as: "Only four buildings, which were constructed to be cyclone-proof after Bondo in 2006, withstood the estimated 350 km/h (220 mph) gusts, even then sustaining moderate damage." Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 04:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Wilhelmina Will: These issues should be rectified now. I'm not the nominee, but have edited this article substantially.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, very much! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Wilhelmina Will: These issues should be rectified now. I'm not the nominee, but have edited this article substantially.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:48, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Upon the completion of this review, I believe the article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:08, 8 June 2016 (UTC)