Talk:Cyclone Filao/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 03:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Well-written:

With a few minor grammatical tweaks, and with the below issues addressed, the article now complies with the MOS policies on grammar and prose, as well as layout and structuring. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 20:30, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

The article's bibliography contains a fairly sizable quantity of reliable publications, and the article makes frequent citations to all of them. No signs of any original research. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 02:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article looks to provide thorough coverage on all relevant aspects of its topic; nothing trivial or otherwise unencyclopedic has been incorporated. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 02:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article takes a fair, unbiased approach to the discussion of its topic. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 02:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

A quick look at the revision history shows that the article has not been involved in any editing disputes since at least April, 2013. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Both images used in the article serve a relevant purpose for encyclopedic illustration, are validly licensed, and are public domain. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Comments

• In the section, "Meteorological history", it states early on, "On February 23, Météo-France's office on the island of Réunion (MFR) started motioning a tropical depression to the northeast of Madagascar. that developed a closed circulation, which received a rating of T1.5 on the Dvorak Scale..." There are a couple of things I want to be sure about, before I conclude this review. In the first place, is "started motioning a tropical depression" correct, or is the word supposed to be "monitoring"? Secondly, the lower case "that", following "northeast of Madagascar." is obviously incorrect, but is it supposed to be the start of a new sentence, or should the period following "Madagascar" be changed to a comma? Other than that, everything looks fine to me. Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 02:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Apologies for the late reply, but I fixed what you're on about. Feel free to go on with the review. YE ^{Pacific Hurricane} 00:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you, very much! Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 20:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

After reading over this article, evaluating it against the criteria, and with the above comments addressed, I now am satisfied that the article meets the criteria for GA inclusion. Congratulations! Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 20:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)