Talk:Cyclone Gafilo
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Todo
editImpact. Jdorje 20:26, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
The article is out of date. The storm history describes the JTWC operational track, whereas the track map reflects the best track data. 2 major changes are the storm did not make landfall as a Cat 5 and it did not drop to TS strength in the first crossing.--Nilfanion (talk) 23:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- I see Gafilo has been named as the strongest cyclone of its' basin on record, but there have been stronger - for example, Daryl-Agnielle had estimated MSLP of 885mb.--Mikoyan21 14:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Gafilo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121112114714/http://www.mwc-info.net/en/services/Journal_PDF%27s/Issue2/Logging_of_Rosewood.pdf to http://www.mwc-info.net/en/services/Journal_PDF%27s/Issue2/Logging_of_Rosewood.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)