Talk:Cyclone Hollanda/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Hurricanefan25 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hurricanefan25 (talk · contribs) 11:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please bear with me hink, I'm going to do my best to review this article. :) It might take a few days to finish, sorry. HurricaneFan25

I'll be doing a prose/writing around 14:00 UTC. Gotta bounce. HurricaneFan25 12:04, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
Comments:

Thanks for the review! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Happy to pass. :) HurricaneFan25 13:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply