Talk:Cyclone Indlala/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TheAustinMan (talk · contribs) 21:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Howdy, Hurricanehink! I'll be taking a look at this article shortly and evaluating it against the good article criteria. --TheAustinMan(Talk ⬩ Edits) 21:26, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
- Madagascar should be linked at least once in prose. Tropical Cyclone Formation Alert, trough (meteorology), and hurricane-force should also be linked.
- Agreed! Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- You describe Indlala as
"The 12th tropical system..."
, but this might be a bit ambiguous. After all, monsoon troughs and unorganized clusters of tropical thunderstorms might also be considered "tropical systems". I'm not sure if there's a workaround, but you might want to check to see if there's a term that MFR uses to collectively describe organized tropical systems.
- Not really, since that might include ZODW and disturbances. I just removed the "12th tropical system", it's not really needed. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Be sure to hyphenate
10-minute
and1-minute
.
- Dash done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- For the statement
"The cyclone struck Madagascar after the country already experienced deadly floods and other cyclones"
, how recent were these floods and cyclones? You indicate three months in the body of the article, so that'd be good to include in the lede, too.
- Changed to "The cyclone struck Madagascar a few months after the country experienced a series of deadly floods and other cyclones." ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- The
Meteorological history
section is sharply written. Stellar work!
- WHOO! Thanks :D ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- From the Mauritius report, I see a peak gust of 65 km/h on St. Brandon and a 48 km/h gust on Agaléga, which seems to be different than what the article says despite citing the same source.
- Shit, thanks for checking that, I must've been rek'd when I wrote that ._. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- The reference "Madagascar: Fifth Cyclone Hits Island Bulletin no. 1/2007" has a different date format than all the other references.
- Merged ref. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- The
Impact
section and the associated source says damage wasover US$240 million
(emphasis mine) while the lede and infobox suggest the damage was either at or around US$240 million, so these should be made consistent.
- True. I indicated in the lead and infobox that it's greater than US$240M. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- For the claim that
"Houses made of concrete fared better than traditional wooden huts"
, in the associated source the report does discuss "traditional houses", but I can't find any description of these traditional homes as being wooden or being huts, as the article claims.
- Changed to the roofs, I think that was a remnant from a previous version of the article. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- I see both
metric ton (tonne)
andton
used in theAftermath
section. It may be useful to provide the relevant metric/customary conversions for these measures so that it is unambiguous what units are being used.
- I forgot this one. I believe I got all of your comments in your GA review, TheAustinMan (talk · contribs). ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- A "US" is missing from
"the American embassy in Antananarivo released $100,000 for urgent relief operations"
.
- Added. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
"along with a tam four disaster management experts"
— I wasn't involved, was I?
- XD fixed ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- The pictures are relevant and public domain, though I think the track map caption should be a bit more descriptive, in line with other cyclone articles, and the date of the infobox image noted in its caption. That caption might also be a good place to note that it depicts the JTWC track since the prose describes a few things that don't really line up with the image (i.e. the reemergence into the Indian Ocean). The selection of images is sufficient, but I would consider perhaps swapping out the satellite image in the
Impact
section for something that hints at the impact a bit more. Perhaps some of these public images from Earth Observatory may be of use.
- I added the date caption and the track map, as well as the NASA pic, good call. I kept both satellite images, because the structure was different when it moved ashore, and because there's room for multiple images. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
And that's all I have to say. I look forward to promoting this article once the above notes are addressed. It's a smooth article and reads like the breeze, sticking to the facts without bludgeoning the details. Certainly checks off the boxes for being readily understandable for the lay person, I think, and the sources are quality. The article appears to cover the necessary scope. The sources are authoritative and reliable on their own already, though I wonder if perhaps the addition of Malagasy sources (search for "Indlala site:.mg" on Google, for instance) may be able to add some local perspective. TheAustinMan(Talk ⬩ Edits) 22:29, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I added a few more hits in Malagasy. I hope my fixes are sufficient. I appreciated the review TAM, and glad you liked it! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)