Talk:Cyclone Japhet
Cyclone Japhet has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
Cyclone Japhet is part of the 2002–03 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Citations need improving
editMany citations contain title, date and maybe an author. It is unclear how these sources can be verified as the citations are incomplete. Are they in print? Then what page? Are they online? Then what is the url? How can these sources be verified? --LauraHale (talk) 03:29, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- No, they're from an online newspaper database that have no URL. They're all from Lexis-Nexis. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:41, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ah! Good. :) Then you can address the tags by putting in full citations. I've re-introduced them until such a time that citations are clear as to where they can be verified from. If it IS Lexis Nexis, then the full citations will say that so I can verify that. :) Otherwise, these facts cannot be verified. :) --LauraHale (talk) 04:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Alright, now they say they're from LN :) --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ah! Good. :) Then you can address the tags by putting in full citations. I've re-introduced them until such a time that citations are clear as to where they can be verified from. If it IS Lexis Nexis, then the full citations will say that so I can verify that. :) Otherwise, these facts cannot be verified. :) --LauraHale (talk) 04:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
File:Japhet rain.png
editFile:Japhet rain.png. Is the tag right? The copyright tag says USA but the source actually says it is the United Nations. Are United Nations copyrights USA government public domain? --LauraHale (talk) 04:11, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- It's from United States Agency for International Development, which is indeed part of the US government. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cyclone Japhet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070421094952/http://www.wmo.int/index-en.html to http://www.wmo.int/index-en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)