Talk:Cyclone Trina

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Cyclone Trina/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

• The lede could use come clarification what/where Mangaia and Rarotonga are. It gives no indication what country the cyclone affected, and for that matter what ocean it was even in. That is key info that should be in the lede.

Done Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• Watch for overlinking (Mangaia is linked twice in the lede, cyclone is uselessly linked).

Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• "$52,000 was needed to repair losses" - you should clarify what currency.

Clarified Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• "Due to the severity of damage caused by Trina, its name was retired in May 2002 and replaced with Tino." - that should appear in the body of the article, and there's no need to have it linked in the lede.

Fixed Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• The first sentence of the MH is a tad confusing for people who don't know about tropical cyclones. They might assume that the upper-level low was the tropical cyclone. You might want to rephrase and say "the origins of Trina", or whatnot.

The low made it's way down to the surface, therefore it was the same system. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 07:22, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

• Why was it mostly stationary for so long?

No reason given in the ATCR Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

• "Parts of the island were inundated with up to 2 m (6.6 ft)" - of what? Did 6.6 feet of rain fall?

Clarified to water Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

All in all, pretty good read. Once these are addressed, I'll be glad to pass. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cyclone Trina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mail-archive.com/newton@newton.digitalspace.net/msg00139.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mail-archive.com/newton@newton.digitalspace.net/msg00172.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)