Talk:Cynthia Ross Friedman
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Message from page subject
editPlease see Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#"My" Wikipage.. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Come on. I did not do my own page. I am plenty annoyed. And I am no fraud - so please remove the anonymous Nick edits or block him for attempt to defame. I am no shrinking violet. Cynthia Ross Friedman (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- Dr. Friedman, I am very sorry that this has happened. It is against Wikipedia policy to defame anyone, and that policy is taken very seriously. I have notified the people who can act on things like blocking someone, which I am not able to do by myself. I've looked at the current version of the page, and I think that anything defamatory has already been removed, but if there is anything else that you would like me to remove, please point it out and I gladly will. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- The template at the top of the page refers to User:ProfessorWatch, not to you. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
- I stand corrected on my definition of "accomplished". Can also mean highly trained or skilled. But such an adjective should still come from a reliable source, not yourself, so as to not sound like gloating (even if it's true). I called you a solo "act", but in light of your "fraud" grievance, am fine if you'd rather "artist". Not so fine with repeating "singer". InedibleHulk (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Thank you and all good! Some disgruntled students are attacking the page. Quite pathetic but very annoying. Your changes are fine - thanks! Cynthia Ross Friedman (talk) 23:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
images as citations
editI have removed the links to images of scanned or photographed news clippings on commons (which are all tagged for deletion there) and replaced them with proper bibliographic citations. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
COI tag
editI have removed the COI tag on the article. In my view, subsequent edits by uninvolved editors have removed all content that does not belong, and have verified the remaining content sufficiently. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 17:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)