Talk:Cyperus rotundus
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 01:35, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Someone, Somewhere, Maybe
editQuoting the article: "Some part of the plant was eaten by humans at some point in ancient history." - Excuse me, what? That's not actually encyclopedic. If anyone on the English wiki wants to improve that article and add actual information, here's some reference in German: dpa in Spiegel Online, July 17th, 2014. Apperently the edible plant is rich of carbohydrates and was eaten in the middle stone age. And it indeed seems to hinder the bacterium "streptococcus mutans".
Also, this article seems to need some quality check - why the heavy stressing of this plant as a "weed" in the entire main section? A short note that it's regarded as a weed in some regions is perfectly enough. Prefaced by biological details about the plant followed by actual information about scientific findings regarding historical usage and medical studies. -- ZweiterSternVonLinks (talk) 22:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cyperus rotundus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://centenarylandscaping.com.au/garden-tips/nutgrass-a-tough-little-nut-to-crack/%2C - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060401033450/http://plants.nrcs.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_cyro.pdf to http://plants.nrcs.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_cyro.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616192931/http://www.toddcaldecott.com/index.php/herbs/learning-herbs/310-musta to http://www.toddcaldecott.com/index.php/herbs/learning-herbs/310-musta
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 16 August 2017 (UTC)