Talk:Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Saskatchewan / Alberta / Geography Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Saskatchewan.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge requests

Latest comment: 18 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Cypress hills interprovincial park is an ugly, article of copy-vio appearance that seems to obviously need a {{CapitalMove}} but there is currently a request that it be merged to Cypress Hills. That may or may not be a good idea. Cypress Hills is currently a nice article about the geography and landforms of the region. An article somehere about the unique "interprovincial" park should exist. http://www.cypresshills.com DoubleBlue (Talk) 17:48, 5 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

The article should not be merged as it is it's own unique place, but it should have a {{CapitalMove}} tag as you said. Obviously it will need to be re-written if it is a copy-vio and cite a source. Zhatt 22:00, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

I believe that you are right Zhatt. I should note that I cannot confirm it's a copyvio, it might just be written by a fan of the park. I cannot find an online source for it but it still does needs a good clean-up. DoubleBlue (Talk) 22:10, 5 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Looking at it again, it doesn't seem to be a copy-vio, just written by someone who is unfamilliar with Wiki conventions of style. It even has references directly in the intro. It mostly just needs to be rearranged into the right style. Zhatt 22:48, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

I just did a slight clean up of the article. Much more work needs to be done! However, I agree with Zhatt that these two articles are talking about two places and should not be merged. Canadian popcan 19:04, 23 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

There is an article about Cypress Hills Provincial Park, which is about the same location and in the same context (park). I believe that a merge would be appropriate in this case. By the way, the correct name for this park is Cypress Hills Interprovincial Park and so I am suggesting the CHPP page be merged to the CHIP page. BrianC 05:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

West Block vs. west block

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I noticed West Block is capitalised in the history section but no where else. East block and centre block are not capitalised. I was going to capitalise it all as, to me at least, they're proper nouns describing a named area. Before I do that, though, I just want to bring it up here first incase I'm wrong. Thoughts? Masterhatch (talk) 13:03, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

(West Block is also capitaised in Geography) Masterhatch (talk) 13:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic