Talk:Cyprien Ntaryamira

Presidential line

Why is Ntaryamira considered the 5th President when he appears as the 7th in line on the List of Presidents of Burundi page? -- 137.73.127.220 (talk) 13:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyprien Ntaryamira. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080410235229/http://www.arib.info/Ijambo14AlamemoiredeNtaryamira.htm to http://www.arib.info/Ijambo14AlamemoiredeNtaryamira.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyprien Ntaryamira/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MatEditzWiki (talk · contribs) 08:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

• Comment First check in Immediate failures
  • It is not a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
  • It does not contain copyright violations
  • It does not have cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include cleanup, POV, unreferenced or large numbers of citation needed, clarify, or similar tags.
  • It is stable and does not have edit warring on the page

MatEditzWiki (talk) 08:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

• Comment First criteria (well written) check:
  • a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; check
  • b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
    • lead section: check
    • layout: check
    • words to watch: check
    • fiction: guideline check not needed
    • list incorporation: guideline check not needed

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

• Comment Second criteria (verifiable) check:
  • a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; check
  • b. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; check
  • c. it contains no original research; check
  • d. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. check

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

• Comment Third criteria (broad in its coverage) check:
  • a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; check
  • b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. check

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

• Comment Fourth criteria check:
  • a. it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. check
  • b. it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. check
  • c. illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: check
    • ca. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; check
    • cb. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. check

Passed. MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)