This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
A very belated follow-up. This has been brought up at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2020 October 29 and Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2020 November 6 as still containing material copy/pasted from the book noted above. A 2010 edition of the book is available on Google Books and seems to have material that was clearly copied from the Wikipedia page, not the other way around. As an example, page 78 of the book has a paragraph "Norway provides... Norway grants. The NGO Fund in Cyprus... Financial Mechanism. It was established in 2004. In 2005, Norway..." which matches a paragraph in this article. The first and last sentence were added by FeydHuxtable in 2009. The middle sentence was added a year later by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). So it seems more likely the paragraph took shape on Wikipedia and was then pasted into that book. I can't find a 2002 version of the book, just the 2010 version. But the fact that the 2010 version hosts material copy/pasted from Wikipedia makes me suspect that whatever other duplicated text was found previously was probably also a backwards copy. With that in mind, I've un-blanked the article and marked the CP thread as resolved. If you think I'm missing something, please feel free to let me know. Ajpolino (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oh also I don't think the book is in the public domain. It says it's published by USA International Business Publications, which seems somewhat dodgy. I can't find much info on them online. Maybe it's defunct? Ajpolino (talk) 00:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply