Talk:Cytec Industries
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 80.232.131.178 in topic Translation / Possible Copywrite Violation
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIt's a tourist guide to Strasbourg: "There are several ways to get to know Strasbourg..." Tonywalton | Talk 16:07, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
Translation / Possible Copywrite Violation
editHere is the translation that I got from Altavista's Babelfish:
- In order to explore Strasbourg, different possibilities offer themselves: With one city-stroll by the old part of town go past you at the most beautiful objects of interest. On the basis of the Ancienne Douane, to the old customs office to the Ill go you in few steps to the world-well-known cathedral. At the cathedral Muenster the Maison chamber cell, a reichverzierter framework construction is worth seeing (today restaurant). Cathedral following by the Rue Hellebardes over the Place good mountain to the former Gerberviertel Petite France with its old pictorial half timbered houses to the Ill up to the Ponts Couverts (covered bridges) and to Vauban resistance. From the observation deck one has a beautiful view over Strasbourg. Interesting also an inspection of the "European quarter" is in the proximity of the Orangerieparks on the bank of the Ill (Council of Europe, European parliament, palace of the human rights)
- Recommendable: commentated ship round travels on the Ill, those the old part of town encloses (landing place at the palace de Rohan) or a round travel with the mini course by the old part of town, duration: 45 minutes of the Place you Chateau out (at the south side of the Muenster). Strasbourg has in the meantime also an exemplary cycle track net. It is worthwhile itself in any case to become acquainted with Strasbourg with the wheel. Our tip: for a daily trip the car in Kehl park and drive by bicycle into the city center Strasbourgs.
The text sounds suspiciously like something out of a brochure and therefore is potentially a copyvio. If someone is able to look into this more, that'd be great. Nevertheless, this article is misnamed and should be moved. Solarusdude 20:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
^^^^what all this has to do with CYTEC industries???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.232.131.178 (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)