Talk:Czech Brazilians
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 2804:14D:5C70:9C92:8908:D45D:7DCD:FB48 in topic Numbers
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Images
editI believe it's very important to keep images on the article.Crazyaboutlost (talk) 15:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Not images based on false statement. Nova Petrópolis is almost entire German-Brazilian, not Czech at all. The source you put does not even claim it is a "major Czech settlement". With a mere population of 5,000 people in entire Brazil, the Czechs are nowhere a "major" population in any Brazilian town.
Do you know what the word "major" really means?? I guess you don't. Opinoso (talk) 14:01, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Actually I do know the meaning. I'll explain it to you: by saying that "Nova Petropolis is a major Czech settlement in Southern Brazil" I mean that Nova Petrópolis is the "greatest in number, quantity" Czech settlement in Southern Brazil. It's quite diferent saying that "Nova Petropolis is a settlement major Czech in Southern Brazil"
- If you're so confused, I can change to some words that you will be able to understand.Crazyaboutlost (talk) 16:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- The source does not claim Nova Petrópolis has the "greatest in number, quantity" of Czechs in Brazil. Anybody who has already been to Nova Petrópolis (which probably is not your case) knows it is a German-Brazilian town, there's nothing Czech about it. Moreover, nobody needs to go there, because there are no sources claiming it is on the Internet. You are inventing this information. Please, assume a good-faith and do not make new resources. Opinoso (talk) 20:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- Crazyaboutlost was blocked for 1 week for his violations in several articles of Wikipedia. Opinoso (talk) 15:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
- It doesn't matter here if Nova Petropolis received more German or Czech immigrants, because this is not an article about "German Brazilians", but about "Czech Brazilians".
- There are 2 million people of Japanese origin in Brazil.[1] That's just a little more than 1% of the Brazilian population, but it doesn't matter -- Brazil does is a major centre of people of Japanese origin!
- Nova Petropolis is one out of three cities in Brazil to which the Czech government sends teachers to teach the Czech language every year (the others being Sao Paulo and Bataypora). Why not Rio de Janeiro or Belo Horizonte for instance? Obviously because there are many people of Czech origin in Nova Petropolis, since Nova Petropolis is originally a major settlement of Czech immigrants to Brazil.
- Finally, if you argue that Nova Petropolis is not one of the major centers of Czech immigration to Brazil, you should provide evidence on all the other centers which would be the major ones instead of just deleting the citation. (Hansch (talk) 21:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC))
References
edit- ^ Câmara de Comércio e Indústria Japonesa do Brasil - SP lança calendário de comemorações do centenário da imigração japonesa
- ^ Generální konzulat České republiky v Sao Paulu - Relações bilaterais entre a República Tcheca e a República Federativa do Brasil
- ^ Colegio Cenecista Frederico Michaelsen - 3ª série recebe visita de mãe de aluno para uma conversa sobre Jablonec
- ^ JusBrasil notícias - Delegação tcheca cumpre agenda educacional no RS
- ^ Associação Comercial e Industrial de Uruguaiana - Em Praga foi inaugurada a Câmara de Comércio Brasil-República Tcheca
- ^ Provedor Rede Sul - Nova Petrópolis - Tchecos querem ampliar relações com RS
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Czech Brazilians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070502061910/http://www.mvcr.cz/sprava/informat/cetnost/2006b/prijm_20nej_m.html to http://www.mvcr.cz/sprava/informat/cetnost/2006b/prijm_20nej_m.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009234007/http://www13.unopar.br/unopar/publicacao/manchete.action?m=282 to http://www13.unopar.br/unopar/publicacao/manchete.action?m=282
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070515003937/http://www.santacatarinaturismo.com.br/inter~26.htm to http://www.santacatarinaturismo.com.br/inter~26.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.mafra.sc.gov.br/conteudo/?PHPSESSID=ac4fa04cb6446e5f294df91f954a41c1&item=11279&fa=5886 - Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.novapetropolis.rs.gov.br/det_noticias.php?id=576&tipo= - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070525111415/http://www.e-prefeituras.pr.gov.br/sites/prefeitura/rolandia/ to http://www.e-prefeituras.pr.gov.br/sites/prefeitura/rolandia/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Numbers
editI corrected the number of "Czech Brazilian" to match the source mentioned: 5.000, not 500.000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:14D:5C70:9C92:8908:D45D:7DCD:FB48 (talk) 19:28, 21 August 2020 (UTC)