Talk:D'Agapeyeff cipher

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

"Some" is undoubtedly a weasel phrase; I've therefore edited it out. Nevertheless, I believe reversion of the deletion is justified as there are indeed "some" who have not only made the stated claim, but are also in the process of applying GAs, notably Dr Gordon Rugg of University of Keele (whose work on potential decryptions of the Voynich MS was featured in Sci Am last year).

As the author of one of the first papers in the refereed cryptologic literature showing how to use GAs for decryption, I'd also count myself among that weasely "some". I'd also argue that the inclusion of the statement could also help stimulate further progress using this particular approach. Robma 14:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Good enough for me. Thanks. — ciphergoth 14:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

As the A D'A square brackets link his name back here, and there is 'nothing obvious on the internet' have removed them for now. Jackiespeel (talk) 09:27, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on D'Agapeyeff cipher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131031012511/http://www.robertmatthews.org/Dagapeyeff.html to http://www.robertmatthews.org/Dagapeyeff.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:30, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic