Talk:Dæmonen
Dæmonen has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 26, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dead link
editDuring several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
The web page has been saved by the Internet Archive. Please consider linking to an appropriate archived version: [1]. --Stwalkerbot 22:28, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Dæmonen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Gabriel Yuji (talk · contribs) 16:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
The article seems good to me. Only a few issues you must address:
- Its mentioned on lead that Dæmonen is designed by Bolliger & Mabillard, but there is no mention about it on the article's body.
- Fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- The flow of sentece is broken by parentheses in "Following the turn, the train enters the main 65.6-foot (20.0 m) drop (reaching the roller coasters top speed of 48 miles per hour (77 km/h)) leading directly into a vertical loop."
- Fixed.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- "Also, unlike traditional steel roller coasters, Dæmonen has no floor on its trains." needs a source
- The linked article is the source. Also, if you look at RCDB (which is a reliable source) it says the coaster is a Floorless Coaster. Either way, I've put a ref.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- "In 2004, Dæmonen was voted the 98th best steel roller coaster in the world in Mitch Hawker's Best Steel Roller Coaster Poll. The roller coaster peaked at 65th place in 2005." lack of source
- Source is in the table. No need to put a footnote at the end of the sentence IMO.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Is really necessary to mention "Dæmonen has never placed in Amusement Today's Golden Ticket Awards"? I think it would only be helpful/informative for readers if it had placed on this award.
Gabriel Yuji (talk) 16:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, because the GTA awards are the most well known amusement park awards. It is also mentioned in several other GA roller coaster articles that have not placed in the awards.--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
@Gabriel Yuji: I have addressed your comments. Thanks for the review!--Dom497 (talk) 20:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Since you have addressed the issues I pointed and I couldn't find other issues, I'll pass it. Congratulations! Gabriel Yuji (talk) 01:21, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dæmonen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090227102453/http://www.tivoli.dk/composite-4681.htm to http://www.tivoli.dk/composite-4681.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)