Talk:D.C. Statehood Green Party
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 January 2017. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Second most popular party?
editThe claim that the SGP is the second most popular party in DC seems to be based on the fact that in 2006 all SGP candidates combined got more votes than all Republican candidates combined, but the SGP was running more candidates, so the statistic is misleading. In registration, the SGP has less than a sixth of the voters the Republicans do. KCinDC (talk) 16:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've revised the first paragraph to clarify where the claim comes from. KCinDC (talk) 14:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on D.C. Statehood Green Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160423161217/http://www.dcregs.dc.gov/Notice/DownLoad.aspx?NoticeID=5959309 to http://www.dcregs.dc.gov/Notice/DownLoad.aspx?NoticeID=5959309
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
...by state categories
editWashington, D.C. is a city, not a state. Also, it can't exactly be a D.C. Statehood party if D.C. is already a state... ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:36, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- The District of Columbia isn't a state. It's a terroeitory with one city - Washington, D.C.. Since they're coterminus, they have one government. Me-123567-Me (talk) 16:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- The party itself and its national organization consider it a state-affiliate. For the purposes of this article, that should be sufficient for including it in the GPUS by state category.--TM 22:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- That is not how a state is formed. The Green Party is not authorized under the Constitution to admit a new state to the Union. Jack N. Stock (talk) 02:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- And if the Green Party considered it a part of Argentina, would you recategorize it as an Argentine political party? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:31, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- The party itself and its national organization consider it a state-affiliate. For the purposes of this article, that should be sufficient for including it in the GPUS by state category.--TM 22:21, 21 August 2018 (UTC)