Talk:D.C. United

La Norte was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 16 August 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into D.C. United. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

D.C. United was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 6, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
November 22, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
August 28, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as High-importance).

Football: American & Canadian / D.C. United Mid‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the D.C. United task force (assessed as Top-importance).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the D.C. United article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 6 months

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[2006 Major League Soccer season#Team Awards|2006]] The anchor (#Team Awards) has been deleted by other users before.
[[List of MLS club post-season droughts#Post-season appearance droughts|failed to qualify for the MLS Cup Playoffs]] The anchor (#Post-season appearance droughts) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Wayne Rooney

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Fixed sourcing issue I forgot about. The DC season is over but the MLS season isn't so that's why it says TBD. DONT TOUCH IT. Instead discuss here about it SubOP (talk) 02:36, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA concerns

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the GA criteria because there is lots of uncited text, including entire sections. Is anyone interested in fixing up this article, or should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

D.C. United

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

There is a lot of uncited text, including multiple paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 14:10, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic