Talk:D. E. Shaw Research
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters in topic Not G11
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Not G11
editI can't see any plausible claim that this article meets CSD G11. The article describes a privately held company, but the tone of the description does not resemble advertising copy. Moreover, this company (and specifically its research papers) have been widely mentioned in scientific literature, and the company is of general notability.
Disclaimer: I consult for DEShaw Research myself, quite apart from being an active Wikipedian. I didn't write this article, but my familiarity with the company informs my judgement of its notability. LotLE×talk 20:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)