Talk:D. Garrison Hill
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of D. Garrison Hill be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Beat me to it
edit@Snickers2686 looks like you beat me to it, I've been trying to put together an article for him for a few days :) but thanks for creating it Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
- One thing of note @Snickers2686, the sccourts.org website is not in the public domain.
Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:35, 14 February 2023 (UTC)All materials, unless otherwise noted, are Copyright © 2023 by the South Carolina Judicial Department.
If you don't mind I'm going to try to flesh out the legal career section and cover the notable cases he worked as a lawyer and presided over as a judge. Hopefully I can get it to C class or better! Philipnelson99 (talk) 05:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
DOB is in source
edit@Snickers2686 The justice's DOB is clearly given in the source on page 186. Please check cited sources before marking them as failing verification. Philipnelson99 (talk) 00:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Philipnelson99: I know how to check sources. What you've cited is only 126 pages and Hill is NOT mentioned in this source. Snickers2686 (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- I linked the incorrect source, it wasn't super difficult to find with a google search. I know where to find source materials, I just have about 20 of these on my computer and copied the link to the wrong document. https://www.scstatehouse.gov/JudicialMeritPage/TranscriptPublicHearingsDec2003.doc
- Philipnelson99 (talk) 12:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
- Link to source for clarity. Philipnelson99 (talk) 00:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
For what it's worth I think the highest office held needs to be the first thing after the subject of the article's name. WP:CONTEXTBIO is superseded by WP:ROLEBIO and in this case the highest office would be relevant enough. Philipnelson99 (talk) 00:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)