Talk:D. J. Wilson/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 09:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Will review. MWright96 (talk) 09:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

General

edit
  • Any numbers between one and nine should be spelt out in words per [[[MOS:NUMERAL]] apart from dates and percentages etc.

2015-16 season

edit

2016-17 season

edit

2017-18 season

edit

Going to hold this review until the reviewer has responded to the queries raised above. MWright96 (talk) 20:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply