Talk:DANiiVORY

Latest comment: 4 years ago by William Allen Simpson in topic "all-female"

Notability

edit

According to the current criteria set forth in Wikipedia:Notability (music), meets the standards of:

6. Is an ensemble which contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles.

Probably meets some others, too, due to multi-continental tours, television appearances, etc. But the mentions of her by name have been trivial. It's the bands as a whole that are covered thus far.
--William Allen Simpson (talk) 11:49, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Based on criterion #6 (as discussed), she "may be" notable. WP:NMUSIC does not state she is notable. It specifically says that "meeting any of these criteria does not mean that an article must be kept." Basically, the listed criteria are rules of thumb. As with all WP:BLP articles, it comes down to existence of independent reliable sources sufficient to write a reasonably detailed biography. I haven't looked too closely at this article yet, but the "mentions of her by name have been trivial" comment is troubling. - SummerPhDv2.0 12:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

"all-female"

edit

I have removed three separate instances of "all-female" from band descriptions. Until such time as the Beatles (etc.) are routinely described as "all-male", such descriptions are inappropriate. - SummerPhDv2.0 12:54, 7 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

And yet, wikipedia has an article about it, for the very reason that they are notable. Also, Black Lives Matter, you don't need All Lives Matter.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 16:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DANiiVORY. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on DANiiVORY. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply