Talk:DES-X

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I believe DESX was used as the algorithm for encrypted containers in Windows 2000.

I also remember reading about an Al-Queda laptop that was recovered by Allied forces. Export-grade (low key size) DESX encryption was used on the laptop but that did not prevent the intelligence agencies (NSA?) from decrypting everything.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.163.167.174 (talk • contribs) 13:42, 12 November 2005

Since back when "export grade cryptography" meant anything, it meant 40-bit encryption (i.e. keys of strength equivalent to 40 bits or less); since plain DES has a 56 bit key; and since DES-X strengthens the keying, the idea of "Export-grade (low key size) DESX" makes no sense at all. I suspect you were on the wrong end of a much distorted rumour. -- Securiger (talk) 10:33, 2 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Broken link

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The link to "How to protect DES against exhaustive key search" (http://wwwcsif.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/papers/desx.ps) is broken; I have found (well, Google has!) what I think is the same material at http://www.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/papers/desx.pdf. As I'm not confident with how I should change (if at all) the other data that surrounds the reference (Springer-Verlag (1996), pp. 252–267, etc) I'll refrain from changing the URL, and let a more experienced editor do the change.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgiuntoli (talk • contribs) 15:03, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic