Talk:DIY Kindle Scanner

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 129.21.230.198

The title for this article is interesting and mysterious, which makes it very memorable. I like how organized your article is, but maybe you could add more content to it. As it is right now, your article only used the biggest level of heading. You can make your article more diverse by adding some subheadings. It was a really good idea to add citations and links to other articles, genius move. However, it would be nice if you could also have a picture of the DIY Kindle Scanner robot for reference. Just one last comment, maybe add some information or a link to an article concerning the legal and social reaction of Amazon and other E-Book stores to make it more notable. Nonetheless, awesome job, I learned a lot from your article.

I agree with what they said. I would maybe try to find somemore information about the DIY Kindle Scanner, but if you can't then maybe try to have a subsection about the inventor. You could include why he made the device or some of the other thing that he/she created as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by V.mas7 (talkcontribs) 21:59, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article is very well written, easy to read, but I would suggest adding a separate References section and to add some more content on the effects of this Kindle Scanner or the reaction to it from users. Khyejxxn (talk) 22:10, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Good straightforward article, however you might want to have a separate section for references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrangeRIT101 (talkcontribs) 22:08, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Good lead paragraph. Tell us a bit more about the artist in the Background paragraph - nationality, age, etc. Add a section before operation describing the device - what it looks like, etc. Add a section after operation discussing reception and reaction to the work, i.e. where it has been shown, what others have said about it, and so on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.21.230.198 (talk) 19:08, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply