Talk:DSB (railway company)

GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

The above message looks like a boiler plate (forgive the pun!). To be honest, in the case of this article, lack of inline citation is not the main issue: the article has absolutely no secondary sources, which are essential for an encyclopedia article. Geometry guy 22:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Moved

I've moved the article from Danske Statsbaner to DSB (railway company), and I'm afraid it's a bit long overdue. The name "Danske Statsbaner" is never used in any non-historical context on their website, and the Danish CVR register of businesses has only the name "DSB" registered. The "Danske Statsbaner" name probably disappeared with the restructuring in the 1990s, though I can't find any source to directly support this. — Peter L <talk|contribs> 19:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Oresund bridge

A knowledgeable contributor should add info about the Oresund bridge and the extension of DSB services into Sweden. Folks at 137 (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DSB (railway company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120610000134/http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/railion-recruits-another-member.html to http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view//railion-recruits-another-member.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050203185250/http://bane.dk/visArtikel.asp?artikelID=256 to http://www.bane.dk/visArtikel.asp?artikelID=256

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on DSB (railway company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://dsb.dk/cs/BlobServer?blobtable=Download&blobcol=urldownload&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobkey=id&blobwhere=1144384185200&ssbinary=true&filename=file.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050307174302/http://www.dsb.dk/servlet/Satellite?pagename=Millenium%2FPage%2FIndholdsside_med_sidemenu_og_introindhold&c=Page&cid=1085757433151 to http://www.dsb.dk/servlet/Satellite?pagename=Millenium%2FPage%2FIndholdsside_med_sidemenu_og_introindhold&c=Page&cid=1085757433151
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050306030544/http://www.dsb.dk/servlet/Satellite?pagename=Millenium%2FPage%2FIndholdsside_med_sidemenu_og_introindhold&c=Page&cid=1002806878241 to http://www.dsb.dk/servlet/Satellite?pagename=Millenium%2FPage%2FIndholdsside_med_sidemenu_og_introindhold&c=Page&cid=1002806878241

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)