Reads like an opinion piece

edit

The section on "Editor Hal W. Hardenberg" reads more like an opinion piece rather than actual facts. I enjoyed reading it, but mentioning his writings were amusing (instead of amusing to some) seems more like an opinion. cbmeeks 14:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Hal has very bad 6809 and 6502 programming in his journals

edit

Looking through his comparison examples, he keeps programming the 6502 and the 6809 like they were designed to emulate the 68000 instructions. Anybody well expirienced with 6502 and 6809 know never to use 32-bit math and you don't need to load and store before and after every math or logic instruction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.57.203.59 (talk) 02:23, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Obviously. I mean who wouldn't know that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.137.205.157 (talk) 04:57, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well gee, there's nothing like a little constructive criticism decades after the fact, when the subject matter has lost all practical relevance and the author has passed on. lol — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.172.120 (talk) 03:20, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Reply