Talk:Daehanjiji

Primary source

This aricle is about a primary source in the nationalism biased dispute about the Liancourt Rocks. Bouth sides show documents, witch should show, that their position is right. This is just one of them and the context is not shown and the article is in this way POV. External Weblink is a POV-blog. --Neojesus (talk) 22:12, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Primary source & POV; true but not a major, fundamental, un-quick-fixable problem that cannot be solved; fast-paced subject developments call for fast-paced remedies, which I shall gladly provide within reason of course

Hi, all! I plan to update this article having cleared up messy issues in the corresponding Korean article(https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EC%A7%80%EC%A7%80), which basically boils down to one of bibliography, a fairly straightforward topic in the area of history-geography-philology-and-of-course-classical Chinese grammar, only compounded by the nasty, noisy, annoying issues surrounding the hair-pulling Liancourt Rocks~Dokdo~Takeshima slap-n-poke dog fight in the mud pit. If you have any points to raise regarding this article (especially the Korean one, which I shall base most, if not all, augmentations, emendations, and type-o corrections for the corresponding English counterpart, now (=within 24 hours) is the time to do it. If you read Korean, please refer to it, and review it and comment on it so that I can start transferring any relevant material in translation. I shall try to keep the number of editing to a minimum as far as I can manage, and I shall try to keep each editing within one logical category or with less material than within one. Lex (talk) 06:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

This appears to be essentially the same text?

But the title and date of publication differ. This is the elementary geography textbook published in 1909 according to the Encyclopedia of Korean Culture, and its textbook name transliterates as Choesin Chodeung Daehanjiji. MargaretRDonald (talk) 04:58, 3 September 2023 (UTC)