Talk:Daglish, Western Australia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Daglish, Western Australia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Trains2050 (talk · contribs) 10:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Greetings! I will be reviewing this article and suggest any changes to be made! I am going to use a template so it will be easy for you to see the progress. By the way I am going to make small changes such as grammar corrections, clarity and spelling corrections, this is to save all of us time however for general suggestions, I will leave them for you to change. If you want to revert my changes, please feel free to do so and let me know. Thanks Trains2050 (talk)

General suggestions

• Is the 2021 census data published? Or not yet, if it is published, please update the data. Thanks
  • That is not published yet. I will come out mid this year. Steelkamp (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
• In the education section, it does mention that its in the catchment area of Shenton college however Shenton College is a partaly selective school, is there any non selective high school that Daglish is in the catchment area for?
  • When it says Shenton College is partially selective, it means that the school is selective for its GATE program, but not for students in general. There is no test or anything to get into that school for students living in the intake area, which includes Daglish. The first two paragraphs of Shenton College#Education should explain more. Steelkamp (talk) 10:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	looks great! Just see general suggestions
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	very good layout does not seem to contain any words to watch
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Seems good
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	seems good
	2c. it contains no original research.	all backed up
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Good coverage
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	most pictures are own work
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Can you spread out the pictures more.
	7. Overall assessment.	On hold until changes are made Trains2050 (talk) @Trains2050: I have removed an image so that there are no longer any adjacent images, and I've addressed your other comments. Steelkamp (talk) 10:38, 13 February 2022 (UTC) Hello, I am currently on a cruise ship and using Wiki mobile. Will try to sign in on one of the ships computer later on and pass it. if not, I will pass it on Saturday when I am back. sorry for the delay. Trains2050 (talk) 15:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC) @Trains2050: It has been two weeks. Steelkamp (talk) 08:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC) @Steelkamp Completely forgot. Will do it in 4 hours when i am home. thanks Trains2050 (talk) 09:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)