Talk:Dagsposten (Swedish newspaper)

Requested move 17 October 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

---

Dagsposten (newspaper) → Dagsposten (Swedish newspaper) – "Dagsposten (newspaper)" is not enough of a disambiguation as Dagsposten, the article it is disambiguating against, is also about a newspaper. JIP | Talk 00:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

• Support per nomination. Dagsposten (newspaper) is incomplete disambiguation and should redirect to a potential Dagsposten disambiguation page that would list Dagsposten (Norwegian newspaper) as well as Dagsposten (Swedish newspaper). —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 06:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
• It's not really necessary. There are only two possible choices for Dagsposten, both of which get a tiny number of daily views, and each article already has a hatnote pointing to the other. A dab page would do absolutely nothing that the hatnote doesn't do for anyone looking for the Swedish newspaper, and would occasionally cause an unnecessary extra step for some people looking for the Norwegian paper. Station1 (talk) 19:21, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

There are over 100,000 two-entry dab pages listed under Category:Disambiguation pages with short descriptions and tilting at individual ones when these are submitted to RM does not appear capable of achieving a consensus against such pages. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

That's one reason I did not put a bold "oppose" in front of my comment. Just pointing out that whether this move is carried out or not makes virtually no difference to the reader. Station1 (talk) 00:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

• Support its silly to have "X" at a base name and "X (qualifier)" as a disambiguated title with both Xs are newspapers. The Norwegian one has 16 views compared with 24[[1]] for this one so there's probably no primary topic. I don't understand why this is even being discussed, it looks uncontroversial like Talk:Room 13 (Wallace novel)#Requested move 26 December 2020. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
• Support "Dagsposten (Norwegian newspaper)" and "Dagsposten (Swedish newspaper)". Taylor 49 (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.