This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daihatsu Copen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of ダイハツ・コペン from ja.wikipedia. (748941074 et seq.) |
Untitled
editsoooo... what's the economy difference between the two versions? i'm not personally that bothered, but i do note the figure for the 660cc original is given in indeterminate (US or imperial?) "mpg", and that for the later 1300 is in L/100km... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.180.56 (talk) 01:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
The Copen goes a lot faster in the 660 CC version than the article claims, I've driven one from 2004 up to the present, so I should know! The top speeds for the two engine versions are about equal, in fact with the top up they both do about 175 Km/h when the engine is warm. Also, the copen is clearly inspired by the Nissan Figaro which the article does not mention at all. 77.165.209.212 (talk) 03:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC) Jacques Mattheij
What is DVVT? An acronym should not be used without explaining its meaning or providing a reference. Dante Matsui (talk) 01:01, 15 October 2020 (UTC)