Talk:Dalbergia

we need something on rosewood the type of wood too

why was it mainly blacks?

Removed redirect from Rosewood Talk page

I've removed the redirect from the above mentioned page. Rosewood is an article in itself and should not have its talk page redirected to here. Mouse Nightshirt 23:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Discuss link

Is a link to photos of woods from the Dalbergia family with information on them a valid link. The site in question has no advertising www.russianwolfstudios.com/Rosewoods-%28Dalbergia%29.php -Woodfanatic (talk) 17:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dalbergia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081116124133/http://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.shtml to http://www.cites.org/eng/app/appendices.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dalbergia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090507010254/http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?3367 to http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/genus.pl?3367

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Larvae food

It is stated that Dalbergia sissoo is used as food for larvae of some Lepidoptera species including Bucculatrix mendax. The wording suggests that this butterfly or moth not only eats the Dalbergia species but that they are farmed for some purpose, what purpose? This information may belong to the (very brief) Bucculatrix mendax article but the comment is written here, where the statement was found. There is no picture of Bucculatrix mendax but pictures of other Bucculatricidae species suggest it's not for their beauty.150.227.15.253 (talk) 09:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)