Talk:Dale Thomas (footballer)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

WP:NOT

edit

I recently cleaned up this article a whole lot. This page seems to have been edited primarily by Collingwood supprters, but try to keep it neutral. Things like "he may go on to be captain" or "he is the messiah to the collinwood supporters" are really not helping the encyclopedia in the long run. Remember: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, see WP:NOT Michael Billington (talkcontribs) 12:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Picture

edit

Can people put i pic in here???? I know its not really imporant but i think some of the general public who dont know what he looks like might want to know. I would but i can figure it out properly. Thanx. also-can you not write how much you love dale in here? it's not a fan site and no one else cares. Someone left an unsigned comment which im gonna delete but its really stupid people! Peace out gEorGE144.136.34.13 07:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

new page edit

edit

ok i have edited the page...heaps! if you dont like it please dont delete it ok. i thought the page needed some images and more info because it just looked boring like most of the other pages.

Too many pictures

edit

Can we get rid of some of them? QazPlm 02:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Agree this article has far too meny for the amount of text. Its more like a photo board. --220.237.166.156 14:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Still way too many pictures. I vote that the majority of the images be up for deletion. Nicwright 04:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Biography assessment rating comment

edit

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 09:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Images for Deletion

edit

I've gone ahead and put almost all the pictures on the page up for deletion - the page borders on looking ridiculous. Whilst other (unsigned) comments have been made (above) that the page looks "boring (and) like most of the other pages", this would almost seem the point of wikipedia.

I also strongly suspect that the images, supposedly created by Fluffyducky, have not been created by Fluffyducky as claimed in the image license. At the very least the last image on the page (his player profile) would belong to the Collingwood FC and could hardly have been created by Fluffyducky.

That being said, with the (hopeful) successful deletion of the ridiculous amount of images that are on this page, a number of sections also need, in my opinion, to be removed - ie. Marks, CTV Shows, The Footy Show, Personal life, Promoting, Arizona: 2006. The information in these sections could be combined into one smaller section if it is deemed appropriate.

Thoughts? Nicwright 04:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Trivia

edit

Wikipedia:Trivia sections sez Avoid creating lists of miscellaneous facts.

Stuff like "cuts his own hair" doesn't matter. "He won a NAB Rising Star nomination in Round 2, 2006" belongs in an awards section.

Also, the '2008' section of history needs to be cleaned up so it just doesn't crap on about anything he happened to do each week. Wongm (talk) 08:48, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dale Thomas (footballer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:10, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply