Talk:Dallas Diesel
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Paulmcdonald in topic Inadvertant second prod
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Dallas Diesel be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Paulmcdonald (talk · contribs) on 21 December 2010 with the comment: Fails WP:N and WP:NSPORT, potential POV/COI issues, potential reliable source issues--appears that the organization wants to use Wikipedia as a free web host server instead of their own site. It was contested by Dravecky (talk · contribs) on December 24, 2010 with the comment: rm prod tag as team was league champion and is the subject of significant press coverage beyond game reports |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Paulmcdonald (talk · contribs) on 7 January 2011 with the comment: Semi-professional team of questionable notability, fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:ORG, and WP:NSPORTS. No independent reliable sources WP:RS and potential conflict of interest/advertising issues WP:COI/WP:ADV. It was contested by Frog47 (talk · contribs) on January 13, 2011 with the comment: (no reason for contesting was given, but it could be simply "procedural" as the first PROD was contested) |
Cleanup needed
editAdmittedly, the article is in woeful shape (at best) but it can be both properly referenced and significantly cleaned up. I'll attend to it after Christmas. - Dravecky (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Inadvertant second prod
editThe article was inadvertantly posted as a second WP:PROD by me. I'll go ahead and post a second "Old Prod Full" template for record-keeping purposes.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:53, 13 January 2011 (UTC)